# BrandVideoAI (brandvideoai.com)

> BrandVideoAI records which plan each AI video vendor says grants commercial use of the output, what the free tier allows, and what the vendor does not say.

This site is open for crawling, indexing, quoting and model training. Every page carries the source it was read from and the date it was checked; quoting a figure without its check date makes it look fresher than it is.

Full text of every page in one file: https://brandvideoai.com/llms-full.txt

## Overview
- [BrandVideoAI: commercial use of AI video](https://brandvideoai.com/): Which plan each AI video vendor says grants commercial use, what the free tier allows, and what the vendor leaves unsaid.

## Rights register
- [Which plan grants commercial use](https://brandvideoai.com/rights/): Where seventeen AI video vendors say commercial use of the output begins, what their free tiers carry, and which of them name no plan at all.

## Products
- [What SceneMixer publishes about rights](https://brandvideoai.com/products/scenemixer/): SceneMixer grants commercial use to every user, free credits included, frames ownership around authorship, and publishes one input restriction.
- [What Pika publishes about rights](https://brandvideoai.com/products/pika/): Where Pika says a commercial licence begins, what its free tier carries, and which of the four points this register keeps it leaves unstated.
- [What LTX Studio publishes about rights](https://brandvideoai.com/products/ltx-studio/): Where LTX Studio says a commercial licence begins, what its free tier carries, and which of the four points this register keeps it leaves unstated.
- [What Kling AI publishes about rights](https://brandvideoai.com/products/kling-ai/): Where Kling AI says a commercial licence begins, what its free tier carries, and which of the four points this register keeps it leaves unstated.
- [What Luma publishes about rights](https://brandvideoai.com/products/luma/): Where Luma says a commercial licence begins, what its free tier carries, and which of the four points this register keeps it leaves unstated.
- [What Runway publishes about rights](https://brandvideoai.com/products/runway/): Where Runway says a commercial licence begins, what its free tier carries, and which of the four points this register keeps it leaves unstated.
- [What invideo AI publishes about rights](https://brandvideoai.com/products/invideo-ai/): Where invideo AI says a commercial licence begins, what its free tier carries, and which of the four points this register keeps it leaves unstated.
- [What Synthesia publishes about rights](https://brandvideoai.com/products/synthesia/): How Synthesia attaches its use restriction to the avatar rather than to the subscription, and what its licensing page lists as allowed and not allowed.
- [What HeyGen publishes about rights](https://brandvideoai.com/products/heygen/): Why the HeyGen permission sits in a help article about exporting rather than on the plan table, and what condition the wording attaches to it.
- [What Hailuo AI publishes about rights](https://brandvideoai.com/products/hailuo-ai/): How Hailuo AI answers the ownership question and leaves the commercial-use question unworded, and why the disclaimer is conditional on paying.
- [What Higgsfield publishes about rights](https://brandvideoai.com/products/higgsfield/): The entry that fills all four register columns from one help centre answer, including the ownership line and the restriction on images of other people.
- [What Fliki publishes about rights](https://brandvideoai.com/products/fliki/): The free tier that writes its exclusion down instead of implying it, and the ownership line Fliki publishes alongside the commercial licence.
- [What Leonardo.Ai publishes about rights](https://brandvideoai.com/products/leonardo-ai/): The entry whose free tier grants commercial use and charges for it in visibility, and where ownership turns on whether a generation stayed private.
- [What Adobe Firefly publishes about rights](https://brandvideoai.com/products/adobe-firefly/): Why the Adobe Firefly statement is a claim about how the models were trained rather than a permission attached to one of the plans on the page.
- [What HunyuanVideo publishes about rights](https://brandvideoai.com/products/hunyuanvideo/): The licence that answers the commercial-use question with a map and a user count instead of a subscription tier, and what it says about outputs.
- [What Wan publishes about rights](https://brandvideoai.com/products/wan/): The shortest answer in this register: an Apache 2.0 licence on the weights and one sentence disclaiming any rights over what the model produces.
- [What Stable Video Diffusion publishes about rights](https://brandvideoai.com/products/stable-video-diffusion/): The licence that sets its commercial-use boundary with an annual revenue figure, and what it says happens to the grant once a business passes it.

## How it is read
- [What counts as a licence statement](https://brandvideoai.com/reading/): Why this register reads priced pages rather than terms of service, when a feature icon counts, and why the free tier has its own column.
- [How an absence becomes a recorded reading](https://brandvideoai.com/reading/reading-by-omission/): What makes a missing line strong enough to record, why the method is printed beside the cell, and why it never becomes a prohibition.
- [What a blank cell records](https://brandvideoai.com/reading/blank-cells/): Why the register writes no licence statement published rather than leaving a cell empty, and the three conclusions the phrase deliberately refuses.
- [Why every cell carries its own date](https://brandvideoai.com/reading/dates-and-staleness/): What a reading date asserts, why a site-wide date would be worse than none, and how to tell which cells are worth checking again.
- [Why the wording stays close to the vendor's](https://brandvideoai.com/reading/quoting-not-paraphrasing/): Why a paraphrase of a permission is a different permission, where tightening is allowed, and what the register does when wording will not fit a cell.
- [Which documents are read, and which are not](https://brandvideoai.com/reading/which-pages-are-read/): The scope of documents this register reads, why negotiated enterprise terms sit outside it, and what that means for a cell recorded as blank.
- [How a vendor earns a row in the grid](https://brandvideoai.com/reading/one-vendor-one-row/): The test for inclusion in this register, why published model weights sit beside subscriptions, and what would remove a row.
- [When a cell is worth a page of its own](https://brandvideoai.com/reading/when-a-cell-earns-a-page/): The test a recorded cell has to pass before it gets a page of its own, and the reason most of this register's empty cells never do.
- [What makes two rows worth comparing](https://brandvideoai.com/reading/how-a-pair-is-chosen/): The test a comparison has to pass here, why two vendors agreeing is not a pair, and what a mismatch in evidence quality earns.
- [How the numbers in the prose are kept honest](https://brandvideoai.com/reading/counting-and-totals/): Why a count in a sentence has to match the register, what happens when a row is added, and why subset claims are treated differently from totals.
- [What this register refuses to record](https://brandvideoai.com/reading/outside-the-cells/): The four things a cell will never contain: an interpretation, a prediction, a judgement of value, or advice about a particular use.
- [What happens when a vendor rewrites a page](https://brandvideoai.com/reading/vendor-rewording/): Why a previous reading is kept rather than overwritten, how a handle survives a rewording, and what a changed cell looks like.
- [How a licence file and a plan table share a column](https://brandvideoai.com/reading/weights-and-plans-together/): Why rows with no plans are kept in a register organised around plans, what their cells contain instead, and what is lost by doing it.
- [Where the outbound links point](https://brandvideoai.com/reading/where-the-links-point/): Why every row links to the vendor's own page, what is never added to those links, and why the deep pages link to each other the way they do.
- [How an error gets fixed, and what stays](https://brandvideoai.com/reading/corrections/): What happens when a reading is wrong rather than stale, why the previous version is kept, and what a reader should send.

## Questions
- [What a free tier lets you do with the output](https://brandvideoai.com/questions/free-tier-licence/): Five free tiers here withhold commercial use and five grant it, and the withholdings are established in two quite different ways.
- [The plan at which commercial use begins](https://brandvideoai.com/questions/where-the-licence-begins/): Seven of the seventeen vendors name a plan at which commercial use starts, with crossing points from ten dollars a month to thirty a month.
- [Owning the work and being allowed to run it](https://brandvideoai.com/questions/ownership-versus-permission/): Sixteen vendors answer whether output may be used commercially, and eight answer the separate question of what a customer owns in the finished work.
- [What you are allowed to feed in](https://brandvideoai.com/questions/inputs-not-just-outputs/): Four vendors publish a restriction on what may be supplied as an input, and three of the four are about the likeness of a real person.
- [A clean file is not the same as a licensed one](https://brandvideoai.com/questions/watermark-and-licence/): On several vendors the plan that removes the visible mark and the plan that grants commercial use are not the same plan.
- [When the expensive plan says less than the cheap one](https://brandvideoai.com/questions/silence-on-the-higher-plans/): One vendor names commercial use on its lowest paid plan and stops repeating it on the two above. Neither reading of that silence is safe.
- [The vendors with no free plan to read](https://brandvideoai.com/questions/the-free-plan-that-does-not-exist/): Two of the seventeen vendors sell plans with no free one, and three publish no plans at all, so the free-tier question has nothing to read on five rows.
- [Where each vendor puts its permission statement](https://brandvideoai.com/questions/what-you-may-feed-it/): Seven vendors answer the permission question on a plan card. Six answer it in prose with no plan attached, and three answer it inside a licence file.
- [The vendors who grant commercial use with no plan](https://brandvideoai.com/questions/no-plan-attached/): Four vendors grant or assert commercial use without naming a plan, which is the shape a register built around a crossing point handles worst.
- [The conditions that money cannot clear](https://brandvideoai.com/questions/conditions-that-are-not-money/): Three rows here carry conditions no subscription can satisfy: a defined territory, a ceiling on active users, and a revenue figure in the accounts.
- [What a vendor keeps after declining to own it](https://brandvideoai.com/questions/what-a-vendor-keeps/): Two vendors decline ownership of user output and keep broad rights over it. Declining to own and taking a licence are compatible positions.
- [The rows that publish weights instead of plans](https://brandvideoai.com/questions/weights-instead-of-plans/): Three vendors answer the commercial-use question with a licence file published beside model weights, so there is no plan and no price to read.
- [The free tiers that already grant commercial use](https://brandvideoai.com/questions/free-tiers-that-grant-it/): Four free tiers here sit inside a commercial-use statement and charge for something else instead: privacy, capacity or a clean file.
- [The document each permission is filed in](https://brandvideoai.com/questions/where-the-answer-is-filed/): Where a vendor keeps its commercial-use statement decides whether anybody finds it: a plan page, a licence, a help article or nowhere at all.
- [Who is expected to hold the consent record](https://brandvideoai.com/questions/who-holds-the-consent-record/): Where a vendor conditions use on a person's consent, the duty and the record sit with the customer, and no supplier can produce either after a complaint.
- [What a licence says happens at its own limit](https://brandvideoai.com/questions/what-happens-at-the-limit/): Some licences state what follows when a condition stops being met: termination, a request, or nothing at all because no limit was attached.
- [The rows that say what happens if a rule is broken](https://brandvideoai.com/questions/consequences-for-breaking-a-rule/): Almost no vendor here attaches a consequence to the boundary it draws. One states that a video breaking the rules may lead to the account being suspended.
- [What the ownership column is mostly made of](https://brandvideoai.com/questions/the-ownership-column-silence/): Nine of the seventeen rows say nothing about who owns the output. The eight that do use four different kinds of sentence to say it.
- [The free tiers that withhold a clean file](https://brandvideoai.com/questions/a-clean-file-and-a-licence/): On four rows the free tier's visible limit is a mark rather than a permission, and on some of them the permission is not tiered at all.
- [Where a grid built around plans stops working](https://brandvideoai.com/questions/where-a-plan-shaped-grid-stops/): Ten of the seventeen rows answer the crossing-point question with something other than a plan, which is a limit of the grid rather than a gap.
- [The restriction that names the platforms it excludes](https://brandvideoai.com/questions/named-platforms-in-a-restriction/): One vendor lists paid television, Facebook, Instagram and YouTube advertising by name, telling a planner which line items are affected.
- [The two free tiers that write their exclusion out](https://brandvideoai.com/questions/written-free-tier-exclusions/): Two vendors tell free users what they may not do, in words. Everywhere else in this register a free-tier exclusion is read from a line missing off a card.
- [Whether someone else can end up with the same output](https://brandvideoai.com/questions/is-the-output-exclusive/): Five vendors say who else may hold or use what you generate: a licence back to the vendor, public work others can remix, or plain non-exclusivity.
- [Who carries the risk if generated output infringes](https://brandvideoai.com/questions/who-carries-infringement-risk/): One vendor describes its models as safe for commercial use. Others put the risk on the user in so many words, or tie the grant to clean inputs.

## Explainers
- [What a plan change does to old work](https://brandvideoai.com/learn/what-changes-on-a-plan-change/): Permissions attach to a plan. Moving between plans raises questions about material already produced that the plan table does not answer.
- [The order to read a vendor's terms in](https://brandvideoai.com/learn/reading-a-terms-page/): Commercial-use answers are spread across four kinds of page that can disagree. Reading them in the wrong order produces a confident wrong answer.
- [What a client asks before it ships](https://brandvideoai.com/learn/clearing-a-deliverable/): A generated deliverable gets the same questions every time. Having the answers written down before they are asked is most of the work.
- [A licence and ownership are different things](https://brandvideoai.com/learn/licence-versus-ownership/): Vendor permission to use output commercially is one question. What rights exist in the finished work is another, and pricing pages answer only the first.
- [What to record about every clip you keep](https://brandvideoai.com/learn/production-file/): A short list of things to note at generation time so that a question about rights, two years later, has an answer that does not depend on memory.
- [Getting a permission in writing from a supplier](https://brandvideoai.com/learn/asking-for-a-sentence/): Most gaps in a permissions record close with one short email. What to ask for, what to avoid asking, and what to do with the reply.
- [Keeping one file per supplier, and what goes in it](https://brandvideoai.com/learn/a-supplier-file/): What to keep about each generation supplier so that a rights question can be answered in an afternoon rather than reconstructed from memory.
- [Which account and entity hold the permission](https://brandvideoai.com/learn/which-account-holds-it/): Why the login and the legal entity that signed up can decide a rights question, and what to settle before a project starts rather than after.
- [Logging what went into a generated clip](https://brandvideoai.com/learn/prompt-and-input-logs/): Why the input side of a pipeline carries most of the rights exposure, what a usable log contains, and why prompt text sometimes counts as an input.
- [Putting rights into a freelance brief](https://brandvideoai.com/learn/briefing-a-freelancer/): What a brief has to say so that generated material arrives with a permission the client can rely on, and the three sentences that do most of the work.
- [When a client contract asks for more than exists](https://brandvideoai.com/learn/client-contract-mismatch/): Why a standard clause promising all rights in a deliverable collides with generated material, and the schedule that resolves it.
- [Generated video for a regulated brand](https://brandvideoai.com/learn/regulated-sectors/): Why an acceptable use policy can rule out a campaign that passes every licence test, and which categories to check before commissioning anything.
- [Keeping the file, the plan and the date together](https://brandvideoai.com/learn/archiving-exports/): Why a finished file carries no evidence of the permission it was made under, and what a delivery log has to hold to stand in for that.
- [What moves and what does not when you change supplier](https://brandvideoai.com/learn/changing-vendor/): Which parts of a rights position travel with a production when the tooling changes, and which have to be rebuilt from nothing.
- [What changes when you run the model yourself](https://brandvideoai.com/learn/running-weights-yourself/): Self-hosting swaps a subscription for a licence file and moves the monitoring, the obligations and the responsibility onto the team running it.
- [Releases for the people in generated material](https://brandvideoai.com/learn/consent-paperwork/): What a usable release says when a person's likeness or voice is used in generated video, and why scope and dates matter more than signatures.
- [A label you owe a platform is not a licence](https://brandvideoai.com/learn/labels-owed-to-platforms/): Why disclosure rules about generated material come from platforms and regulators rather than suppliers, and why they change on a different clock.
- [A rights pass before a series goes into production](https://brandvideoai.com/learn/a-rights-pass-for-a-series/): A short pass over the rights position before committing to a series, in the order that finds the expensive problems first.

## Register columns
- [The free tier column, and what it records](https://brandvideoai.com/fields/free-tier/): What the free tier column holds, how a line missing from a plan card becomes a recorded exclusion, and which free tiers grant commercial use.
- [What the commercial use from column holds](https://brandvideoai.com/fields/commercial-use-from/): The condition each vendor attaches to commercial use, the page that sentence was read from, and why a monthly price is not what the column records.
- [The owned column, and what now fills it](https://brandvideoai.com/fields/owned-work/): What the owned column holds, the four shapes a published ownership answer takes here, and why a disclaimer is not the same as a grant of ownership.
- [The input restriction column, and its four rows](https://brandvideoai.com/fields/input-restriction/): What the input restriction column holds, the four vendors that fill it, and where a rule about what you may feed in usually lives instead.

## Recorded cells
- [Pika's free plan, and the $8 plan beside it](https://brandvideoai.com/records/pika-free-tier/): Commercial use is absent from Pika's free plan and from the $8 plan above it, which makes this free-tier reading a matter of two cards rather than one.
- [LTX Studio's free tier writes its exclusion out](https://brandvideoai.com/records/ltx-studio-free-tier/): LTX Studio calls its free and Lite plans a personal use licence and says what that excludes, reaching a brand's own posts and not just paid ads.
- [Kling AI's Basic plan and a line it omits](https://brandvideoai.com/records/kling-ai-free-tier/): Every paid Kling AI membership says generated content is for commercial use. The free Basic plan does not carry that line, which makes the gap readable.
- [Luma's plan list has no free plan on it](https://brandvideoai.com/records/luma-free-tier/): No free plan appears in Luma's plan list as read, so the free-tier question does not arise here rather than being answered one way or the other.
- [Runway's free plan and the line next to it](https://brandvideoai.com/records/runway-free-tier/): Runway's free plan carries no commercial-use line while the paid columns do, and a side-by-side comparison is the layout that makes such a gap legible.
- [invideo AI publishes no free plan to read](https://brandvideoai.com/records/invideo-ai-free-tier/): No free plan appears on invideo AI's plan page, which removes the commonest licence trap in this register and makes every customer a paying one.
- [Synthesia's $0 plan and the limit it draws](https://brandvideoai.com/records/synthesia-free-tier/): Synthesia lists a Basic plan at $0 and puts logo removal on a paid tier, while the boundary that decides where a video may run is drawn elsewhere.
- [HeyGen's Free plan and a watermark boundary](https://brandvideoai.com/records/heygen-free-tier/): HeyGen lists a Free plan at $0 and puts watermark removal on a paid tier, while the permission to use a video commercially sits in a help article.
- [Hailuo AI's unpaid tier loses two things](https://brandvideoai.com/records/hailuo-ai-free-tier/): Unpaid Hailuo AI downloads carry a watermark, and the sentence disclaiming ownership of generated content is written to cover paid subscribers only.
- [Higgsfield grants free users the same rights](https://brandvideoai.com/records/higgsfield-free-tier/): Higgsfield says commercial-use rights follow from its terms for all users, free accounts included, and puts the paid boundary on clean downloads.
- [Fliki's free plan states its exclusion in words](https://brandvideoai.com/records/fliki-free-tier/): Fliki's free plan is published with no commercial rights to media and a watermark on exports, one of two written exclusions in this register.
- [Leonardo.Ai's free tier charges in visibility](https://brandvideoai.com/records/leonardo-ai-free-tier/): A free Leonardo.Ai user may download their generations for commercial usage, while their concepts stay publicly viewable for other users to remix.
- [Adobe Firefly's free plan inherits the claim](https://brandvideoai.com/records/adobe-firefly-free-tier/): Adobe Firefly lists a free plan with daily limits, and the commercial claim on that page is made of the models rather than of any single plan.
- [Kling AI crosses into commercial use at $10](https://brandvideoai.com/records/kling-ai-crossing-point/): Kling AI states commercial use on Standard at $10 a month and repeats it on every paid card, which is the lowest crossing point recorded here.
- [Pika crosses at $28, two plans above free](https://brandvideoai.com/records/pika-crossing-point/): Commercial use is included on Pika from the $28 plan upward, which leaves a paid plan at $8 sitting below the licence rather than at it.
- [LTX Studio lists a commercial licence from Standard](https://brandvideoai.com/records/ltx-studio-crossing-point/): LTX Studio lists a commercial use licence from its Standard plan, and describes the two plans below it as carrying a personal use licence instead.
- [Fliki grants a commercial licence on any paid plan](https://brandvideoai.com/records/fliki-crossing-point/): Fliki states that the Standard plan carries a commercial license to all the content you create, and that any paid plan gives the user commercial rights.
- [Luma names $30 a month as the commercial plan](https://brandvideoai.com/records/luma-crossing-point/): Luma lists commercial use on its Plus plan at $30 a month, or $25 billed yearly, and the plans above it do not restate the line.
- [Runway lists commercial use on the paid plans](https://brandvideoai.com/records/runway-crossing-point/): Runway lists commercial use on its paid plans as a group, naming no single plan and no figure as the point where the permission begins.
- [invideo AI lists commercial use with no free tier under it](https://brandvideoai.com/records/invideo-ai-crossing-point/): invideo AI lists commercial use on the paid plans and offers no free plan, so the same category wording that is risky elsewhere has nothing below it.
- [Higgsfield has no plan to cross into commercial use](https://brandvideoai.com/records/higgsfield-crossing-point/): Higgsfield says there is no separate commercial licence to purchase and that commercial use rights follow from the terms of use for all users.
- [Leonardo.Ai crosses into commercial use at zero](https://brandvideoai.com/records/leonardo-ai-crossing-point/): Leonardo.Ai grants commercial usage to free users, while full ownership of a generation turns on whether it was made privately rather than on the plan.
- [Synthesia sets its boundary by avatar, not by plan](https://brandvideoai.com/records/synthesia-crossing-point/): Synthesia rules out paid promotion with stock and synthetic avatars and lifts those restrictions for a custom avatar, so no plan marks the boundary.
- [HeyGen grants commercial use without naming a plan](https://brandvideoai.com/records/heygen-crossing-point/): HeyGen says a created video may be used across any platform including commercially, provided the inputs follow its guidelines. No plan is named.
- [Adobe Firefly asserts the claim of its models](https://brandvideoai.com/records/adobe-firefly-crossing-point/): Adobe calls Firefly model output safe for commercial use on the basis of its training content, and names no plan as the crossing point.
- [Hailuo AI does not word commercial use at all](https://brandvideoai.com/records/hailuo-ai-crossing-point/): The Hailuo AI page read here disclaims ownership of content generated on a paid plan, and never uses the phrase commercial use either way.
- [HunyuanVideo licences by territory and user count](https://brandvideoai.com/records/hunyuanvideo-crossing-point/): The Hunyuan community licence defines its territory as worldwide excluding the EU, the UK and South Korea, with a user ceiling above that.
- [Wan publishes its weights under Apache 2.0](https://brandvideoai.com/records/wan-crossing-point/): The Wan repository states that its models are licensed under Apache 2.0, which answers the commercial-use question without a plan, a price or a threshold.
- [Stable Video Diffusion sets a revenue threshold](https://brandvideoai.com/records/stable-video-diffusion-crossing-point/): The Stability community licence covers commercial use until the licensee passes a million dollars in annual revenue, when granted licences end.
- [SceneMixer grants commercial use to every user](https://brandvideoai.com/records/scenemixer-crossing-point/): SceneMixer's rights guide grants commercial use of output to every user and counts output made with free credits as paid for, with two limits stated.
- [Higgsfield claims nothing in your inputs or outputs](https://brandvideoai.com/records/higgsfield-owned-work/): Higgsfield states plainly that it does not claim ownership of inputs or outputs, which is the shortest form this column takes on any row here.
- [Hailuo AI declines ownership and takes a licence](https://brandvideoai.com/records/hailuo-ai-owned-work/): Hailuo AI does not claim ownership of content generated on a paid plan, and on the same page takes a broad licence to use and modify that content.
- [Fliki puts publishing rights with the user](https://brandvideoai.com/records/fliki-owned-work/): Fliki says publishing rights are owned by the user of the content and that it owns no content, which answers a narrower question than ownership.
- [Leonardo.Ai ties ownership to a privacy setting](https://brandvideoai.com/records/leonardo-ai-owned-work/): On a private Leonardo.Ai generation the user keeps full ownership, while broad perpetual rights over public content stay with the vendor.
- [HunyuanVideo claims no rights in the outputs](https://brandvideoai.com/records/hunyuanvideo-owned-work/): The Hunyuan community licence says the vendor claims no rights in outputs you generate, and that you and your users are solely responsible for them.
- [Wan claims no rights over generated contents](https://brandvideoai.com/records/wan-owned-work/): The Wan repository claims no rights over your generated contents and grants freedom to use them, provided the use complies with the published licence.
- [Stable Video Diffusion says you own the outputs](https://brandvideoai.com/records/stable-video-diffusion-owned-work/): The Stability community licence says you own any outputs generated from the models, to the extent permitted by applicable law.
- [SceneMixer frames ownership around authorship](https://brandvideoai.com/records/scenemixer-owned-work/): SceneMixer says what a production owns is the human-authored work: the script, the selection and arrangement of shots, and substantive edits.
- [Synthesia requires consent for a custom avatar](https://brandvideoai.com/records/synthesia-input-rule/): A Synthesia custom avatar requires the person to be over the applicable legal age and to have given free, informed consent for their likeness.
- [HeyGen conditions its grant on the inputs](https://brandvideoai.com/records/heygen-input-rule/): HeyGen asks that uploads avoid copyright violations and that character inputs stay clean, as the condition its commercial grant depends on.
- [Higgsfield asks permission for a person's image](https://brandvideoai.com/records/higgsfield-input-rule/): Higgsfield states that an image of another person may not be uploaded or used without that person's permission, a duty placed on whoever supplies the file.
- [SceneMixer takes photos with rights, people with consent](https://brandvideoai.com/records/scenemixer-input-rule/): On a paid plan a photo can serve as a character reference if the user holds the rights; the terms bar deepfakes of real people without documented consent.

## Two at a time
- [Kling at ten dollars, Luma at thirty](https://brandvideoai.com/pairs/kling-and-luma-crossing-point/): Kling AI names commercial use from ten dollars a month and Luma from thirty, the two ends of the priced range in this register.
- [Pika prices the licence, Higgsfield does not](https://brandvideoai.com/pairs/pika-and-higgsfield-crossing-point/): Pika includes commercial use from its third plan at twenty-eight dollars, while Higgsfield says there is no such licence to buy at any price.
- [Runway draws a category, Hunyuan draws a map](https://brandvideoai.com/pairs/runway-and-hunyuanvideo-crossing-point/): Runway grants commercial use to its paid plans as a group, while the Hunyuan licence excludes the EU, the UK and South Korea from the territory it covers.
- [Wan attaches no threshold, Stability attaches one](https://brandvideoai.com/pairs/wan-and-stable-video-diffusion-crossing-point/): Wan publishes its weights under Apache 2.0 with no threshold, while the Stability licence stops covering commercial use above a revenue figure.
- [Hunyuan counts users, Stability counts revenue](https://brandvideoai.com/pairs/hunyuanvideo-and-stable-video-diffusion-crossing-point/): The Hunyuan licence stops at a hundred million monthly active users while the Stability licence stops above a million dollars of annual revenue.
- [HeyGen files a grant, Adobe files a claim](https://brandvideoai.com/pairs/heygen-and-adobe-firefly-where-filed/): HeyGen keeps its commercial permission in an article about exporting a video, while Adobe puts a claim about its models where a plan grant would sit.
- [Synthesia bars paid ads, Fliki grants the lot](https://brandvideoai.com/pairs/synthesia-and-fliki-paid-plans/): Synthesia rules out paid promotion with a stock avatar whatever the plan, while Fliki grants a commercial licence to all content on any paid plan.
- [LTX excludes, Leonardo grants, on the free tier](https://brandvideoai.com/pairs/ltx-studio-and-leonardo-ai-free-tier/): LTX Studio calls its free plan personal use and excludes promotional activity, while Leonardo.Ai lets free users download generations for commercial usage.
- [Fliki writes the exclusion, Higgsfield writes none](https://brandvideoai.com/pairs/fliki-and-higgsfield-free-tier/): Fliki states that its free plan carries no commercial rights to media, while Higgsfield says commercial rights follow from its terms for every user.
- [Kling leaves a gap, Higgsfield writes a sentence](https://brandvideoai.com/pairs/kling-and-higgsfield-free-tier/): Kling AI's free plan omits the commercial-use line every paid card carries, while Higgsfield states that the rights cover all users including free ones.
- [Pika implies it, Fliki says it in words](https://brandvideoai.com/pairs/pika-and-fliki-free-tier/): Pika's free plan and its eight dollar plan both omit commercial use, while Fliki states in words that its free plan carries no commercial rights to media.
- [Hailuo takes a licence back, Wan takes nothing](https://brandvideoai.com/pairs/hailuo-and-wan-owned-work/): Hailuo AI declines ownership of paid-plan content and grants itself a broad licence over it, while the Wan repository asks for nothing back.
- [Leonardo asks about privacy, Stability does not](https://brandvideoai.com/pairs/leonardo-and-stable-video-owned-work/): Leonardo.Ai gives full ownership on a private generation and keeps broad rights over public ones. Stability states ownership once, in a licence.
- [Higgsfield disclaims flatly, Hailuo asks for payment](https://brandvideoai.com/pairs/higgsfield-and-hailuo-owned-work/): Higgsfield says it claims no ownership of inputs or outputs, while Hailuo's disclaimer is written around content generated on a paid subscription.
- [Fliki names publishing rights, SceneMixer names layers](https://brandvideoai.com/pairs/fliki-and-scenemixer-owned-work/): Fliki says publishing rights rest with the user, while SceneMixer describes the script, shot selection and substantive edits as what a production owns.
- [Synthesia builds consent in, Higgsfield asks for it](https://brandvideoai.com/pairs/synthesia-and-higgsfield-input-rule/): Synthesia attaches consent and a legal age requirement to the custom avatar route, while Higgsfield places the duty on whoever uploads a person's image.
- [HeyGen conditions uploads, SceneMixer asks for consent](https://brandvideoai.com/pairs/heygen-and-scenemixer-input-rule/): HeyGen makes clean inputs the condition on its grant; SceneMixer takes a photo with the rights, and a real person only with documented consent.
- [Kling repeats a card line, Synthesia keys on avatars](https://brandvideoai.com/pairs/kling-and-synthesia-crossing-point/): Kling AI prints the commercial-use line on every paid membership, while Synthesia sets the limit by the avatar in the video and no plan marks it.
- [Luma names thirty dollars, HeyGen names nothing](https://brandvideoai.com/pairs/luma-and-heygen-crossing-point/): Luma lists commercial use on a thirty dollar plan, while HeyGen grants it for videos generally in a help article without naming any plan.
- [Adobe promises provenance, Hunyuan limits territory](https://brandvideoai.com/pairs/adobe-firefly-and-hunyuanvideo-conditions/): Adobe rests its commercial claim on licensed and public domain training content, while the Hunyuan licence excludes three jurisdictions from its territory.
- [Leonardo keeps public rights, Hailuo keeps a licence](https://brandvideoai.com/pairs/leonardo-and-hailuo-kept-back/): Leonardo.Ai retains broad rights over publicly viewable content, while Hailuo takes a worldwide licence over the content a user generates.
- [One sentence, two rows, different exposure](https://brandvideoai.com/pairs/runway-and-invideo-ai-crossing-point/): Runway and invideo AI both grant commercial use to the paid plans, but only one of them has a free tier sitting underneath that wording.
- [Kling licenses the first plan, Pika the third](https://brandvideoai.com/pairs/pika-and-kling-crossing-point/): Kling AI attaches commercial use to its first paid membership while Pika attaches it to the third plan, leaving one paid plan outside the licence.

## Licence words
- [Commercial use, as a permissions page uses it](https://brandvideoai.com/words/commercial-use/): What commercial use decides in a permissions document, the three different questions readers ask it to answer, and which one it actually settles.
- [Personal use, and what it rules out](https://brandvideoai.com/words/personal-use/): Why personal use is wider than most readers assume, what it typically excludes, and why the definition matters more than the phrase.
- [The grant, and the qualifiers around it](https://brandvideoai.com/words/licence-grant/): A licence grant is a sentence plus its qualifiers: scope, duration, territory and conditions, any of which can remove most of what it gives.
- [Owning the output, and who can settle it](https://brandvideoai.com/words/output-ownership/): Why a vendor can decline a claim to your output but cannot grant you ownership of it, and what the difference means for a production.
- [Publishing rights, and what they leave out](https://brandvideoai.com/words/publishing-rights/): Publishing rights answer whether a file may go out, and stop there. Why a product with a stock library often uses the narrower phrase.
- [Royalty-free, and what it does not mean](https://brandvideoai.com/words/royalty-free/): Royalty-free means no recurring fee per use. It says nothing about ownership, exclusivity, permitted uses or whether anybody else holds rights.
- [The licence back, beside a disclaimer](https://brandvideoai.com/words/licence-back/): Why a document can decline to own your output and still take a broad licence over it, what that licence is usually for, and when the breadth matters.
- [Non-exclusive, and whose position it describes](https://brandvideoai.com/words/non-exclusive/): Non-exclusive in a grant means other customers get the same permission. In a licence back it means you may still use the material yourself.
- [Perpetual, and what cancelling does not undo](https://brandvideoai.com/words/perpetual/): What perpetual and irrevocable do to a clause, why they matter most in a licence back, and what a cancelled subscription leaves behind.
- [Worldwide, and the definitions that shrink it](https://brandvideoai.com/words/worldwide/): Why worldwide in a grant is not always worldwide, how a defined territory works, and what a carve-out of named jurisdictions does to a reader.
- [Sublicensable, and passing a permission on](https://brandvideoai.com/words/sublicensable/): Why sublicensable is the qualifier agency work turns on, what it means in a grant and in a licence back, and what its absence implies.
- [Derivative works, on both sides of a clause](https://brandvideoai.com/words/derivative-work/): What derivative works covers in a permissions document, why it appears in grants and in licences back, and what it means for an edited clip.
- [Inputs and outputs, as these documents split them](https://brandvideoai.com/words/inputs-and-outputs/): Why permissions documents treat what goes in and what comes out as separate questions, and why the input side carries most of the real exposure.
- [A watermark, and the fact it actually settles](https://brandvideoai.com/words/watermark/): Why a visible mark on an export is a constraint on publishing rather than on permission, and why the two get conflated on free tiers.
- [The acceptable use policy, and its categories](https://brandvideoai.com/words/acceptable-use/): Why the list of forbidden categories sits in a separate document, which categories recur across vendors, and how it narrows a grant nobody reread.
- [The terms of service, against a plan page](https://brandvideoai.com/words/terms-of-service/): Why a sentence on a plan page and a clause in the terms carry different weight, and what to do when the two describe the same permission differently.
- [The plan card, and a line missing from it](https://brandvideoai.com/words/plan-card/): How a comparison table becomes evidence about permissions, when an absent line supports a reading, and why it never becomes a quotable rule.
- [A seat, and the permission attached to it](https://brandvideoai.com/words/seat/): What per-seat pricing does to a licence question, why the account that exported a file matters, and what happens when a seat changes hands.
- [A community licence, and what it really is](https://brandvideoai.com/words/community-licence/): Why a community licence looks like open source and behaves like a bespoke contract, and which parts of it have to be read fresh every time.
- [A permissive licence, and its small obligations](https://brandvideoai.com/words/permissive-licence/): Why a named permissive licence answers a commercial-use question in three words, and which light obligations it nonetheless brings with it.
- [A user ceiling, and who has to notice it](https://brandvideoai.com/words/monthly-active-users/): What a monthly active user threshold does in a model licence, why it is measured by the licensee, and which products are near it without realising.
- [A revenue threshold, and whose revenue counts](https://brandvideoai.com/words/revenue-threshold/): Why a revenue cap in a licence is harder to answer than it looks, what termination means when it is crossed, and what a good year does to a grant.
- [Territory, and whose location counts](https://brandvideoai.com/words/territory/): Why a territorial condition is about where the licensee is rather than where the audience is, and what that means for a company with several offices.
- [A carve-out, and where it hides](https://brandvideoai.com/words/carve-out/): How an exception narrows a grant without amending it, the places carve-outs are normally filed, and why reading a document backwards finds them.
- [Assignment, and why a licence is not one](https://brandvideoai.com/words/assignment/): The difference between assigning rights and licensing them, why agency contracts ask for the first, and what to do when only the second is available.
- [Consent, and the three parts of the requirement](https://brandvideoai.com/words/consent/): What free, informed consent asks for when a real person's voice or likeness is used, why scope matters more than signature, and who keeps the record.
- [Likeness, and why copyright does not cover it](https://brandvideoai.com/words/likeness/): Why a person's appearance raises a different claim from copyright in an image, and why clearing the photograph does not clear the face in it.
- [A stock avatar, and what travels with it](https://brandvideoai.com/words/stock-avatar/): Why a presenter supplied by a vendor can carry limits no subscription lifts, and why those limits belong to the person who was filmed.
- [A custom avatar, and the duty it brings](https://brandvideoai.com/words/custom-avatar/): Why building a presenter from a real person removes a supplier's restriction and installs a longer obligation to that person instead.
- [An indemnity, and why it is usually absent](https://brandvideoai.com/words/indemnity/): What an indemnity would add to a commercial-use grant, why suppliers avoid giving one for generated output, and what stands in for it.
- [Supplied as is, and what it removes](https://brandvideoai.com/words/as-is/): Why an as-is disclaimer sits next to almost every permission in this subject, what it excludes, and why it is not a reason to distrust the grant.
- [Termination, and work already delivered](https://brandvideoai.com/words/termination/): What terminating a licence stops, what it does not unmake, and why almost no document in this subject says what happens to earlier output.
- [Suspension, and what it puts at risk](https://brandvideoai.com/words/suspension/): Why an account suspension clause is a sharper risk than a licence limit for a production in flight, and why so few documents attach a consequence at all.
- [Attribution, as courtesy and as condition](https://brandvideoai.com/words/attribution/): When crediting a supplier is optional and when it is a condition the grant depends on, and where the obligation usually appears in this subject.
- [Provenance, and the risk it addresses](https://brandvideoai.com/words/provenance/): What a statement about training material asserts, which worry it answers, and why it is not a substitute for a permission or an indemnity.
- [Training data, and both directions of it](https://brandvideoai.com/words/training-data/): Why training material raises one question about what a model learned from and another about whether your own uploads are used, and why they get confused.
- [An opt-out, and what it cannot retract](https://brandvideoai.com/words/opt-out/): Why an opt-out applies forward rather than backward, what a product setting can and cannot undo, and why the date of the switch matters.
- [A public generation, and what it spends](https://brandvideoai.com/words/public-generation/): Why visibility inside a product is a commercial term rather than a privacy setting, and what it costs a campaign built on a distinctive look.
- [A bundled library, and the rights inside it](https://brandvideoai.com/words/stock-library/): Why a product containing licensed material can promise less about a finished export, and what to check about what travels with the file.
- [An enterprise licence, and why it is invisible here](https://brandvideoai.com/words/enterprise-licence/): What negotiated terms typically add that a public page cannot, and why the absence of something publicly does not mean it is unavailable.
- [No statement published, and what it records](https://brandvideoai.com/words/no-statement-published/): Why a register records silence in those words, what the phrase deliberately does not claim, and when a silence is worth a page of its own.
- [The reading date, and why every cell has one](https://brandvideoai.com/words/reading-date/): Why a permissions record without a date is worthless, what a date does not promise, and how to tell whether a cell needs looking at again.

## Sections
- [Commercial Use Terms: Higgsfield, Pika, invideo, LTX](https://brandvideoai.com/commercial-pairs/): Four pages on the tools brands name when a clip has to clear a licence: what each vendor's own pages state about commercial use, quoted and dated.
- [Commercial terms as a CSV](https://brandvideoai.com/datasets/): Recorded commercial-use clauses as a comma-separated file, each row carrying the terms page it was quoted from and the date it was read.
- [Vendors and their commercial terms](https://brandvideoai.com/products/): A page for each vendor: which plan grants commercial use, what the free tier allows, and the clause each answer was quoted from.
- [The four columns the register keeps](https://brandvideoai.com/fields/): The four points recorded for every vendor: free tier, the plan commercial use begins at, what is owned, and what may not be supplied as an input.
- [Questions about commercial use](https://brandvideoai.com/questions/): Questions about using AI video commercially, answered by quoting the clauses vendors publish, with the plan and the reading date attached to each answer.
- [Reading a terms page](https://brandvideoai.com/learn/): Explainers on vendor terms: how a broad grant gets narrowed, what a free tier usually withholds, and which categories are carved out by default.
- [The register, one cell at a time](https://brandvideoai.com/records/): Each recorded cell of the commercial-use register on its own page: the wording as published, where it sits, how it was read and what it leaves open.
- [Two vendors at a time](https://brandvideoai.com/pairs/): Two vendors at a time on one column: pairs whose published answers point in different directions, with both statements quoted side by side.
- [The words these documents use](https://brandvideoai.com/words/): What each recurring phrase in an AI video permissions document decides, what it is commonly read as deciding, and which clause has to be read beside it.

## One vendor's terms
- [Higgsfield Commercial Use, per Its Own Terms](https://brandvideoai.com/commercial-pairs/higgsfield-commercial-use/): Higgsfield's help centre states there is no separate commercial licence to buy and that rights follow the terms, for every user. What its plan pages add.
- [Pika's Licence Line and What a Plan Buys](https://brandvideoai.com/commercial-pairs/pika-licence/): Pika's pricing page ties the commercial licence to a plan. Two readings of that page, a month apart, name different entry tiers. Both readings are kept.
- [What invideo AI's Ads Cost, Licence Included](https://brandvideoai.com/commercial-pairs/invideo-commercial-cost/): invideo AI prices seats and credits: Starter $20 a seat, Plus $60, and credits that do not roll over. The licence line sits on the paid plans.
- [LTX Studio's Personal-Use Line, Quoted](https://brandvideoai.com/commercial-pairs/ltx-studio-personal-use/): LTX Studio describes the free and Lite plans as personal use, and its page defines what that rules out. The commercial licence is listed from Standard.