A line repeated on every card, and a line drawn around a presenter
Kling AI prints the commercial-use line on each paid membership, so the boundary is a card and a figure. Synthesia rules out paid promotion with stock and synthetic avatars and lifts it for a custom one, so no card marks anything. As of 2026-09-22.
| The question | Kling AI | Synthesia |
|---|---|---|
| What the boundary keys on | Which membership is paid for | Which avatar is in the video |
| Figure attached | $10 a month at the first paid card | None |
| How it is crossed | Buying the cheapest paid plan | Changing the presenter |
| Can a plan table show it | Yes, and it does | No, and it does not try |
Inclusion rule. Two vendors whose published answers in one column point in different directions, or sit far enough apart that a reader choosing between them would decide differently. Order. The vendor named first in the heading is the one whose wording is quoted first.
1A register built for one shape, holding two
This column was designed around the first row: a plan, a figure, a sentence on a card. The second row cannot be expressed that way at all, because the restriction follows a presenter and presenters are not priced.
Keeping both in one column means the cell sometimes contains a sentence where a reader expects a number. That is a cost of the grid, and the alternative is leaving out every vendor whose answer is not a price.
2What each boundary does to an upgrade path
On the priced row an upgrade never crosses a silent card, because the sentence repeats all the way up. On the avatar row an upgrade does nothing to the restriction, and a customer on the largest plan is in the same position as one on the smallest.
A buyer who reads plan cards to work out what they may do will get the first row right and the second exactly wrong, and the plan page of the second product will not correct them.
3What sits behind each answer
The priced row's line is a commercial decision about what a subscription includes. The avatar row's line exists because a real person's likeness is involved, and lifting it requires that person's consent rather than a payment.
That makes the second boundary harder to move and easier to justify. It is also the only row in this column where the consequence of crossing it is stated on the same page, as a risk to the account.
4A third set of terms on the same question
| The question | SceneMixer | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Commercial use | Output is the user's to the extent the law allows, royalty-free and commercial use included, and output made with free credits counts as paid for | SceneMixer, rights guide |
Inclusion rule. SceneMixer's own published wording on the column this pair was chosen for. Order. The sentence closest to the column first.
Its full row is on the SceneMixer entry.
- Entry pointEvery paid membership lists that generated content is for commercial useStandard upward
- What is ruled outUse in any form of paid promotion is listed as not allowed with stock and synthetic avatars, and paid TV, Facebook, Instagram and YouTube ads are each listed by namestated against the avatar rather than the plan
- How the restriction is liftedWith a custom avatar the licensing restrictions above do not apply, and videos may be used according to the agreement made with the personby avatar type
5Both documents
The first column comes from the membership plans at kling.ai, read 2026-09-12; the second from the video licensing page at synthesia.io, read 2026-09-22. Each vendor’s full row is on Kling AI and Synthesia, and the column being compared is described on commercial use from. A comparison of wording is not legal advice. Other pairs: Luma and HeyGen, Firefly and Hunyuan.