BrandVideoAI

What each vendor's terms say about commercial use

Wan answers the column with a licence and no condition

The models in the repository are licensed under the Apache 2.0 License. That sentence answers this column without mentioning commerce, without naming a plan and without attaching a threshold of any kind. As of 2026-09-22.

What a licence name settles that plan wording cannotA named permissive licence has been read by every legal team that has looked at open source, its text does not change, and it carries no geography, no headcount and no revenue figure. Plan wording carries all three possibilities.Apache 2.0 on the weightsA plan line on a cardWho has read itAnyone who reviews open sourceWhoever wrote the plan pageHow often it changesIt does notWhenever the catalogue is restructuredConditions attachedNone on this pointTier, and sometimes territory or scaleWhat comes with itThe responsibility as wellA support contract, usuallyThe shortest entry in this column, and one of the most stable
Fig. 1 This cell needs no qualifier, because there are no cards and no conditions to record.
One cell of the register: Wan on the crossing point, read from its repository licence note on 2026-09-22.
What the record holdsAs published
The published wordingThe models in the repository are licensed under the Apache 2.0 License
Where it appearsThe repository's own licence note, published with the weights
How the reading was establishedStated as a licence name, with no condition attached to it
What the cell leaves openNothing on this point; the licence is the whole answer

Inclusion rule. One vendor, one column. A cell earns a page when the vendor publishes something specific there, or when its silence is unusual beside the vendors read with it. Order. Fixed order: the wording, then its address, then the method, then the gap.

1The shortest entry in this column

A named permissive licence does more work than a paragraph of plan wording. It has been read by every legal team that has ever looked at open source, its text does not change, and it carries no geography, no headcount and no revenue figure.

That is why this cell needs no qualifier. Elsewhere the register has to record which card a line was printed on and whether the cards above it repeated it; here there are no cards.

2What is absent is the point

No territory carve-out, no monthly active user ceiling, no revenue threshold, no account to hold. The two other weight-publishing rows in this register each attach one of those, which is what makes the comparison between them worth drawing.

A reader who reaches this row after the other two will notice how much of a licence can be conditions rather than grant. This one is almost all grant.

3Why a self-hosted row belongs in a register about plans

Because the question is the same. A brand asking whether it may run generated video commercially does not care whether the answer arrives as a subscription tier or as a file in a repository, and comparing the two shapes is the point of a single grid.

What changes is who carries the operational work. A permissive licence hands over the permission and the responsibility together, and the responsibility does not come with a support contract.

  • Licence
    The models in this repository are licensed under the Apache 2.0 Licensepublished with the weightsWan2.2 repository / recorded 2026-09-22

4Where this reading came from

The cell above was taken from the repository licence note published at github.com, as that page stood on 2026-09-22. The remaining three cells of the same vendor row sit on Wan; the column itself is described on commercial use from. This is a filing decision and not legal advice. Cells nearby: Stable Video Diffusion, crossing point, SceneMixer, crossing point.