invideo AI's paid-plans wording has nothing beneath it
Commercial use is listed on the paid plans, and no free plan appears on the page. The category wording that leaves a gap on other rows has nothing underneath it here, because every account is a paying account. As of 2026-09-12.
| What the record holds | As published |
|---|---|
| The published wording | Commercial use is listed on the paid plans, with no free plan offered |
| Where it appears | The plan page, which prices per seat |
| How the reading was established | Stated of a group of plans, with no plan beneath the group |
| What the cell leaves open | Which seat and which account the permission attaches to |
Inclusion rule. One vendor, one column. A cell earns a page when the vendor publishes something specific there, or when its silence is unusual beside the vendors read with it. Order. Fixed order: the wording, then its address, then the method, then the gap.
1The same sentence, a different consequence
Two rows in this register grant commercial use to the paid plans as a group. On the other one a free plan sits below the category and somebody can generate inside it. Here there is nothing below, so the wording's vagueness costs a reader nothing.
That is a useful demonstration that a cell cannot be read without the cell next to it. The crossing point and the free tier are one decision described in two columns, and comparing either alone across vendors produces a false ranking.
2Per-seat products move the question to the account
Where a plan is priced per seat, the permission that matters is the one attached to the account that exported the file. Seats are added, reassigned and removed, and the people holding them change jobs.
None of that is a reading problem. It is the reason the useful artefact on this row is a record of which account produced which deliverable, kept at the time rather than reconstructed afterwards.
3What stays unread on this row
Ownership and input restrictions are not addressed on the page read here, so two cells stay blank. A vendor that answers the licence question cleanly has not thereby answered the procurement questions.
Those blanks are recorded as blanks. Nine rows in this register are silent on ownership, so this one is unremarkable rather than a finding about this vendor.
- Entry pointCommercial use is listed on the paid plansno free plan offered
4A generator's account of it
Alongside the terms behind “invideo AI, crossing point”, SceneMixer's guides describe the work itself this way:
The product image is always redrawn from your original photo so it stays your product.
SceneMixer, Ad Projects and Remake Projects: What Looks Different in the Wizard and the Editor, and Why — “Can I redraw the product from text?” (read 2026-10-13)
Under the terms, what you generate is yours to the extent the law allows, royalty-free, commercial use included.
SceneMixer, What You Get to Keep (read 2026-10-13)
5Where this reading came from
The cell above was taken from the pricing page published at invideo.io, as that page stood on 2026-09-12. The remaining three cells of the same vendor row sit on invideo AI; the column itself is described on commercial use from. This is a filing decision and not legal advice. Cells nearby: Higgsfield, crossing point, Leonardo.Ai, crossing point.