What Adobe Firefly publishes about rights
Adobe Firefly (adobe.com) says outputs from its AI models are safe for commercial use, and grounds that in training on licensed content and public domain content where copyright has expired. It is a claim about provenance rather than a grant attached to a plan, and no plan on the page is named as the crossing point. As of 2026-09-22.
| Point | What the vendor publishes |
|---|---|
| Free tier | A free plan with daily generation limits, no separate licence line |
| Commercial use from | Not named at a plan; asserted of the models |
| What is owned | No statement published |
| Input restriction | No statement published |
Inclusion rule. The same four points are recorded for every vendor here. A point the vendor does not publish is recorded as no statement rather than inferred from terms of service. Order. Fixed order, identical on every product page.
1Safe for commercial use is not the same sentence as licensed from this plan
Every other assertion in this grid answers the question does the vendor permit this. This one answers a question behind it: is the material the model learned from likely to create a claim against you. Those are different risks with different owners, and only the second is what a plan table can grant.
The distinction matters in a procurement review. A provenance claim addresses the training data and says nothing about the subscription tier a file was made on, so a reader looking for the crossing point finds a reassurance where they expected a permission.
2The free plan inherits the claim because the claim is not tiered
A free plan with daily generation limits sits alongside the paid Firefly plans, and no separate licence line distinguishes it. If the statement is about the models, it is about the models whichever plan called them, which puts this free tier in a stronger position than most of the register.
That reading is the natural one and it is still a reading. The register records the plan column as unnamed rather than asserting that the free tier is licensed, because the page does not draw the line either way.
3What the provenance claim is worth to a brand
Adobe also states that it does not train these models or its partner models on any Creative Cloud subscribers' personal content, which answers a question several clients now ask before footage is uploaded at all. It is about inputs, but about what happens to yours rather than about what you may supply.
None of this substitutes for the missing sentence. A brand wanting the plan-level permission that most of this register records has to ask for it, and the answer will not be on the page where the prices are.
4The same point, across every product
| Product | Free tier |
|---|---|
| Adobe Firefly | A free plan with daily generation limits, no separate licence line |
| Fliki | No commercial rights to media, and a watermark on exports |
| Hailuo AI | Unpaid downloads carry a watermark |
| HeyGen | A Free plan at $0, with the mark removed from $29 |
| Higgsfield | Commercial rights follow for all users, free included |
| HunyuanVideo | Weights published with a licence, so there is no plan to read |
| invideo AI | No free plan offered |
| Kling AI | Not carried on the free Basic plan |
| Leonardo.Ai | Commercial use granted, with generations publicly viewable |
| LTX Studio | Personal use licence on free and Lite |
| Luma | No free plan appears in the plan list |
| Pika | Not included on the free plan or on Standard |
| Runway | Not listed on the free plan |
| Stable Video Diffusion | Weights published under a community licence, no plan to read |
| Synthesia | A Basic plan at $0, with the logo removed from $29 |
| Wan | Weights published under Apache 2.0, with no plan involved |
Inclusion rule. Products whose own terms address commercial use. A product silent on this particular point keeps its row, marked hollow rather than dropped. Order. Alphabetical by product name.
| Product | Commercial use from |
|---|---|
| Adobe Firefly | Not named at a plan; asserted of the models |
| Fliki | Standard, and any paid plan |
| Hailuo AI | Not worded as commercial use anywhere on the page |
| HeyGen | Stated for videos generally, with no plan named |
| Higgsfield | No plan required; the rights come with the terms |
| HunyuanVideo | The licence, outside the EU, the UK and South Korea |
| invideo AI | Paid plans |
| Kling AI | Standard, $10 a month |
| Leonardo.Ai | The free plan, with ownership arriving on the paid ones |
| LTX Studio | Standard |
| Luma | Plus, $30 a month |
| Pika | Pro, $28 a month |
| Runway | Paid plans |
| Stable Video Diffusion | The licence, below USD $1,000,000 in annual revenue |
| Synthesia | Not set by plan; set by which avatar is used |
| Wan | The licence itself, with no threshold attached |
Inclusion rule. Products whose own terms address commercial use. A product silent on this particular point keeps its row, marked hollow rather than dropped. Order. Alphabetical by product name.
| Product | What is owned |
|---|---|
| Adobe Firefly | No statement published |
| Fliki | Publishing rights are owned by the user, and Fliki does not own any content |
| Hailuo AI | Hailuo does not claim ownership of content generated and downloaded on a paid plan |
| HeyGen | No statement published |
| Higgsfield | Higgsfield does not claim ownership of inputs or outputs |
| HunyuanVideo | Tencent claims no rights in the Outputs you generate |
| invideo AI | No statement published |
| Kling AI | No statement published |
| Leonardo.Ai | Full rights on a private generation; broad rights retained by Leonardo over public ones |
| LTX Studio | No statement published |
| Luma | No statement published |
| Pika | No statement published |
| Runway | No statement published |
| Stable Video Diffusion | You own any outputs generated from the models, to the extent the law permits |
| Synthesia | No statement published |
| Wan | No rights claimed over your generated contents |
Inclusion rule. Products whose own terms address commercial use. A product silent on this particular point keeps its row, marked hollow rather than dropped. Order. Alphabetical by product name.
- Commercial useOutputs from Adobe Firefly AI models are described as safe for commercial useasserted of the models rather than of a plan
- Why the claim is madeThe models are described as trained on licensed content and public domain content where copyright has expiredthe training source
- Free tierA free plan with daily generative limits is listed alongside the paid Firefly planslisted without a separate licence line
- What is done with your materialAdobe states it does not train Firefly models or partner models on any Creative Cloud subscribers' personal contentstated on the product page
- Plan that grants commercial useNo licence statement published (as of 2026-09-22)no plan named as the crossing point
5A generator's account of it
Alongside the terms behind “Adobe Firefly”, SceneMixer's guides describe the work itself this way:
The final cut ends on an end card: your main image plus four lines — Brand, Product name, Tagline, Call to action. The first two are read from your photo and your brief; the tagline and call to action are written with the script.
SceneMixer, The End Card (read 2026-10-13)
On the end card, yes, along with the product name, the tagline and the call to action, in the language of the ad.
SceneMixer, AI Ad Video Generator — “Will my brand name appear in the video?” (read 2026-10-13)
6Sources
Read from the plans page on adobe.com, checked 2026-09-22. Every vendor side by side is on commercial use. What a sentence has to do before it counts is on the reading page. Nothing here is legal advice. Next entries: HunyuanVideo, Wan.