Fliki's free plan states its exclusion instead of implying it
The free plan is listed with no commercial rights to media and a Fliki watermark on exports. That is an exclusion in words rather than a line missing from a card, and the word doing the work in it is media. As of 2026-09-22.
| What the record holds | As published |
|---|---|
| The published wording | No commercial rights to media on the free plan, and a watermark added to exports |
| Where it appears | The published answers page, read alongside the plan page |
| How the reading was established | Written out as no commercial rights, not inferred from an absence |
| What the cell leaves open | How output containing none of the bundled library material is treated |
Inclusion rule. One vendor, one column. A cell earns a page when the vendor publishes something specific there, or when its silence is unusual beside the vendors read with it. Order. Fixed order: the wording, then its address, then the method, then the gap.
1A written exclusion and an absent line are different findings
Two vendors in this register tell a free user what they may not do. The rest leave it to a gap in a table. A reader can quote the first kind in a procurement note; the second kind has to be explained before it can be used.
The register keeps the difference in its method column rather than flattening both into the same dash, because the two support different levels of confidence about the same practical conclusion.
2Why the library is doing part of the work
This product bundles stock material, and the paid position is that the media inside it is either licensed or royalty-free. That framing explains why the free exclusion is worded around media: what is being withheld is a right in somebody else's material as much as a right in your own render.
It also means the restriction is not really about the generator. A free user's clip is constrained by what went into it, which is the same logic that makes input rules elsewhere in this register worth reading.
3The question the wording leaves standing
If the exclusion is about media, what covers a clip that used none of the bundled material? Nothing read for this row answers that, and the answer would matter to anybody generating from their own uploads on a free account.
The cell records the published wording and the gap beside it. A register that resolved the ambiguity in either direction would be writing licence terms rather than reading them.
- Free tierThe free plan is listed with no commercial rights to media and adds a Fliki watermark to exportsan exclusion written out rather than implied
4A generator's account of it
Alongside the terms behind “Fliki, free tier”, SceneMixer's guides describe the work itself this way:
Under the terms, what you generate is yours to the extent the law allows, royalty-free, commercial use included.
SceneMixer, What You Get to Keep (read 2026-10-13)
The script is written from the photos and the one-line description. In step-by-step mode you can rewrite it before anything is shot.
SceneMixer, How to Make an Ad from One Photo — “Do I need a script?” (read 2026-10-13)
5Where this reading came from
The cell above was taken from the pricing page and published answers published at fliki.ai, as that page stood on 2026-09-22. The remaining three cells of the same vendor row sit on Fliki; the column itself is described on free tier. This is a filing decision and not legal advice. Cells nearby: Leonardo.Ai, free tier, Adobe Firefly, free tier.