When the expensive plan says less than the cheap one
Luma names commercial use on the Plus plan and does not restate it on Pro or Ultra. The plan cards above the entry point are quieter than the entry point itself, which is the opposite of the order most readers expect. As of 2026-09-12.
| Vendor | What is published | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Plus | Commercial use named on the card | The lowest plan that says it |
| Pro | Line not restated | Read on the same page, same day |
| Ultra | Line not restated | Read on the same page, same day |
Inclusion rule. Recorded from the plan cards on the vendor's own pricing page. A line that is absent from a card is recorded as absent from that card, and nothing is inferred about the terms behind it. Order. Lowest plan naming commercial use first.
1Plan cards are marketing surfaces, not the licence
A feature list on a pricing page exists to make somebody choose a tier. Once a capability has been used to justify the step from free to paid, repeating it on every card above adds nothing to that job and takes up space that a card would rather spend on the reason to step up again.
So the quiet upper cards are readable as a layout decision. What they are not is evidence, in either direction, and a register that turned them into evidence would be inventing a fact the page does not carry.
2The safe reading and the unsafe one
The unsafe reading is that the higher plans withdraw a permission the lower one grants. Nothing on the page says that, and a licence that got narrower as the price went up would be a remarkable product decision. The safer reading is that a plan card is not the artefact that grants the permission, and that it simply stops advertising.
Either way, the artefact a buyer should be reading is the agreement, not the card. This column exists to say which vendors make that necessary and which ones do not.
3Absence is recorded differently from a denial
Three states get separate treatment here: a plan that states commercial use, a plan that states it is excluded, and a plan that says nothing. Collapsing the third into the second is the single most common error in licence comparisons, and it is why the free tiers in this register are annotated with how the conclusion was reached rather than with a tick or a cross.
Where a free plan is simply absent from the page, as it is here, even the free-tier question has no answer to give. There is no plan to read.
- Entry pointCommercial use is listed on the Plus plan at $30 a month, or $25 a month billed yearlythe lowest plan naming commercial use
- Pro and UltraThe higher plans do not restate the commercial use lineby omission from the plan cards
- Free tierNo free plan appears in the plan listabsent from the page as read
4From the making side
Alongside the terms behind “Silence higher up”, SceneMixer's guides describe the work itself this way:
Every character, scene and prop card can carry a short list of the other names your script uses for the same thing.
SceneMixer, Also Called: Nicknames, Old Names, and How the Storyboard Knows Who Is Who (read 2026-10-13)
On the end card, yes, along with the product name, the tagline and the call to action, in the language of the ad.
SceneMixer, AI Ad Video Generator — “Will my brand name appear in the video?” (read 2026-10-13)
5Sources
Each row quotes a plan card or a terms page, gathered on commercial use and read 2026-09-12. The test a sentence has to pass before it counts as a licence statement is set out on the reading page. Nothing here is legal advice. Nearby: No free plan, Where the answer sits, No plan attached.