BrandVideoAI

What each vendor's terms say about commercial use

Wan states the output position in the licence note itself

The repository claims no rights over your generated contents, granting you the freedom to use them provided your usage complies with the licence. Two questions in this register are answered by one sentence and a licence name. As of 2026-09-22.

Two columns answered by one short passageThe licence name answers the crossing point and the same passage claims no rights over generated contents, subject to complying with the licence. Compliance means the notice and attribution obligations that permissive licences carry.Read the noteOne passage namesthe licence andstates the outputposition together.Two answersMeet theobligationsNotices andattribution, whichare light and arestill conditions.ComplianceUse the outputNo rights claimedover generatedcontents, providedthe licence iscomplied with.
Fig. 1 Brevity here is the answer arriving in a form that needed no qualification.
One cell of the register: Wan on what is owned, read from its repository licence note on 2026-09-22.
What the record holdsAs published
The published wordingNo rights claimed over generated contents, subject to complying with the licence
Where it appearsThe repository's licence note, in the same passage as the licence name
How the reading was establishedStated beside the licence name rather than in a separate document
What the cell leaves openNothing on this point, though compliance with the licence remains a condition

Inclusion rule. One vendor, one column. A cell earns a page when the vendor publishes something specific there, or when its silence is unusual beside the vendors read with it. Order. Fixed order: the wording, then its address, then the method, then the gap.

1One sentence covering both columns

The crossing point cell for this vendor reads Apache 2.0 and this one reads no rights claimed, and both come from the same short passage. That is the most compact answer any row here gives to two separate questions.

Compactness is not looseness. A named licence and an explicit output disclaimer are each more definite than a paragraph of plan wording, because neither depends on a catalogue that can be restructured next quarter.

2The condition that does remain

Provided your usage complies with the licence is not decoration. Permissive licences carry obligations, mostly about notices and attribution, and a disclaimer conditioned on compliance is conditioned on meeting them.

Those obligations are light and they are real. A production that ships without the notices has not lost ownership of anything, but it has stopped satisfying the sentence it is relying on.

3What a short cell does not mean

Brevity here is not an absence of an answer; it is the answer arriving in a form that needed no qualification. Elsewhere on this grid a long cell usually signals conditions rather than generosity.

The comparison worth making is with the two other weight-publishing rows, each of which attaches a threshold. Reading the three together shows how much of a licence can be conditions rather than grant.

  • What is owned
    The repository claims no rights over your generated contents, granting you the freedom to use them provided your usage complies with the licencestated in the same sentence as the licenceWan2.2 repository / recorded 2026-09-22

4Where this reading came from

The cell above was taken from the repository licence note published at github.com, as that page stood on 2026-09-22. The remaining three cells of the same vendor row sit on Wan; the column itself is described on what is owned. This is a filing decision and not legal advice. Cells nearby: Stable Video Diffusion, owned work, SceneMixer, owned work.