What Wan publishes about rights

Wan (github.com) publishes its video models under the Apache 2.0 License and states that it claims no rights over your generated contents, granting freedom to use them provided usage complies with the licence. There is no plan, no territory carve-out and no revenue threshold to read. As of 2026-09-22.

Inclusion rule. The same four points are recorded for every vendor here. A point the vendor does not publish is recorded as no statement rather than inferred from terms of service. Order. Fixed order, identical on every product page.

1A permissive licence is a complete answer to two columns at once

Apache 2.0 is a known quantity: a reader does not have to interpret it, a lawyer has almost certainly cleared it before, and it carries no condition about who the licensee is or how large they are. Put on model weights, it answers the commercial-use question without mentioning commerce.

The repository adds the sentence brands actually want, disclaiming rights over generated content in the same breath as naming the licence. That pairing is what makes this the shortest row here and one of the few that needs no follow-up question.

2What is absent is the point

No excluded territories. No monthly active user ceiling. No annual revenue figure above which the grant lapses. The other two weight-published entries in this register each carry one of those, and comparing the three is the clearest illustration that open weights do not imply a uniform licence.

What the licence does not remove is responsibility for the output itself. Compliance with applicable law is stated as the user's, and a defamatory or infringing clip is no more usable because the weights were permissively licensed.

3Why a self-hosted row belongs in a register about plans

Running the model yourself is a real procurement option for a brand with an in-house team, and it moves the rights question from a subscription agreement to a licence file. The question does not disappear; it changes address.

Reading the two side by side is instructive. A hosted product can give a better answer than a permissive licence, and several here do not, which is why this register records the document rather than the delivery model.

4The same point, across every product

Inclusion rule. Products whose own terms address commercial use. A product silent on this particular point keeps its row, marked hollow rather than dropped. Order. Alphabetical by product name.

Inclusion rule. Products whose own terms address commercial use. A product silent on this particular point keeps its row, marked hollow rather than dropped. Order. Alphabetical by product name.

Inclusion rule. Products whose own terms address commercial use. A product silent on this particular point keeps its row, marked hollow rather than dropped. Order. Alphabetical by product name.

• Licence
  The models in this repository are licensed under the Apache 2.0 Licensepublished with the weightsWan2.2 repository / recorded 2026-09-22
• What is owned
  The repository claims no rights over your generated contents, granting you the freedom to use them provided your usage complies with the licencestated in the same sentence as the licenceWan2.2 repository / recorded 2026-09-22

5A generator's account of it

Alongside the terms behind “Wan”, SceneMixer's guides describe the work itself this way:

The photo is cleaned into a product shot and that object appears in every shot.

SceneMixer, An AI Ad for a Physical Product — “Will the product look like my product?” (read 2026-10-13)

On the end card, yes, along with the product name, the tagline and the call to action, in the language of the ad.

SceneMixer, AI Ad Video Generator — “Will my brand name appear in the video?” (read 2026-10-13)

6Sources

Read from the repository licence note on github.com, checked 2026-09-22. Every vendor side by side is on commercial use. What a sentence has to do before it counts is on the reading page. Nothing here is legal advice. Next entries: Stable Video Diffusion, Pika.