Hailuo AI declines ownership and takes a licence back
Hailuo does not claim ownership over content you generate and download while on a paid subscription. The same page grants the vendor a non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty-free licence to use, reproduce, modify and display that content. As of 2026-09-22.
| What the record holds | As published |
|---|---|
| The published wording | No ownership claimed over content generated on a paid plan, with a broad licence back on the same page |
| Where it appears | The subscription service terms, in two clauses close together |
| How the reading was established | Stated as a disclaimer, conditional on paying, with a separate grant alongside |
| What the cell leaves open | Whether the licence back extends to material generated on an unpaid account |
Inclusion rule. One vendor, one column. A cell earns a page when the vendor publishes something specific there, or when its silence is unusual beside the vendors read with it. Order. Fixed order: the wording, then its address, then the method, then the gap.
1Two clauses that do not contradict each other
Declining ownership and taking a licence are compatible positions. One says the vendor is not the owner; the other says it may nonetheless use the material. A reader who stops after the first clause has read half the row.
That is why this cell records both. A grid entry saying no ownership claimed would be accurate and would leave out the sentence that a brand's counsel will actually want to see.
2The condition on the disclaimer is unusual here
Most disclaimers in this column are flat. Attaching one to a paid subscription narrows it, and the page does not state the opposite position for unpaid accounts, so the narrowing creates a gap rather than an answer.
The register does not fill that gap. It records the condition as worded, which lets a reader see that the sentence was drafted with paying customers in mind and that everybody else is outside it.
3What a licence back is for, and why it is worth reading
Vendors take licences of this kind to operate a service: storing a file, showing it in a gallery, or using it in their own promotion. The wording read here is broad enough to cover more than storage, and it says nothing about promotional use either way.
For a brand with confidentiality obligations to a client, that breadth is the material fact on this row. It is not a licence question about the output; it is a question about whose material is now circulating.
- What is ownedHailuo does not claim ownership over content you generate and download while on a paid subscription planconditional on a paid plan
- What the user grants backUsing the services grants Hailuo and its affiliates a non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty-free licence to use, reproduce, modify and display the contentstated on the same page
4A generator's account of it
Alongside the terms behind “Hailuo AI, owned work”, SceneMixer's guides describe the work itself this way:
The spoken lines and the end card follow your interface language across fifteen dialogue languages, with the cast and setting adapted to that market. The end card falls back to a language it can typeset when a script needs shaping or right-to-left layout.
SceneMixer, AI Ad Video Generator — “Which languages can the ad be in?” (read 2026-10-13)
Under the terms, what you generate is yours to the extent the law allows, royalty-free, commercial use included.
SceneMixer, What You Get to Keep (read 2026-10-13)
5Where this reading came from
The cell above was taken from the subscription service terms published at hailuoai.video, as that page stood on 2026-09-22. The remaining three cells of the same vendor row sit on Hailuo AI; the column itself is described on what is owned. This is a filing decision and not legal advice. Cells nearby: Fliki, owned work, Leonardo.Ai, owned work.