BrandVideoAI

What each vendor's terms say about commercial use

A public generation, and the exclusivity it spends

Where a product makes generations visible to other customers by default, that visibility is a commercial term. It does not affect whether a clip may run; it affects whether anybody else can produce something that looks like it. As of 2026-09-22.

What visibility spends, and what it leaves aloneVisibility inside a product does not affect whether a clip may run. It affects whether anybody else can produce something that looks like it, and on some documents it selects which ownership sentence applies.Unaffected by visibilityDecided by visibilityWhether the clip may bepublishedUnchangedNot the questionWhether others can copy theapproachNot the questionExactly what it permitsOwnership of the outputIn most documentsIn some, it selects the clauseWhat privacy costsNot the questionA paid plan, on such productsWhere privacy is what a plan sells, the product is charging for exclusivity
Fig. 1 A free tier can be fine for work nobody minds being copied and wrong for a launch.
What visibility does and does not change about a generated asset. Recorded 2026-09-22.
QuestionWhat the phrase answers
Whether the clip may be publishedUnchanged by visibility
Whether others can copy the approachExactly what visibility permits
Ownership of the outputConditioned on it, in some documents
What privacy usually costsA paid plan, on such products

Inclusion rule. Phrases that appear in more than one vendor's permissions documents and that change what a sentence means. A phrase used by a single vendor in a single clause is described on that vendor's own page instead. Order. Reading order: where you meet it, then what it settles, then what it does not.

1Visibility is priced, which tells you it is an asset

Where privacy is what a paid plan sells, the product is charging for exclusivity rather than for permission. That is a coherent model and an unusual one to meet while reading a licence column.

It also means a free tier can be entirely usable for work nobody minds being copied, and entirely unsuitable for a launch that depends on a look. Same licence, different answer.

2The ownership sentence sometimes turns on it

Some documents attach full rights to a private generation and retain broad rights over a public one. Where that is the case, the setting selects which sentence applies, and two files made minutes apart can sit on different sides.

For a team with freelancers that is a per-clip audit rather than a policy, and audits of settings nobody logged do not go well. The record to keep is the setting, at export.

3What a brand should decide before starting

Whether the look is an asset. If it is, privacy is not a nice-to-have and the plan that provides it is the one to buy, whatever the licence column says.

If it is not, a public tier may be the correct commercial choice, and the register's job is to make sure nobody discovers the trade after a competitor has remixed the concept.

4A generator's account of it

Alongside the terms behind “Public generation”, SceneMixer's guides describe the work itself this way:

A dish photo is cleaned into a product shot and the ad is built around it.

SceneMixer, An AI Ad for a Restaurant, a Café or a Dish — “Will the dish look like my dish?” (read 2026-10-13)

Under the terms, what you generate is yours to the extent the law allows, royalty-free, commercial use included.

SceneMixer, What You Get to Keep (read 2026-10-13)

5Where the sourced wording is

A word page, not an entry in the register: nothing above is attributed to any vendor and nothing above is legal advice. The quoted clauses are on commercial use, the column this phrase turns up in is what is owned, and the reading rules are on the reading page. Next words: Stock library, Enterprise licence, No statement published.