A paid plan that still bans advertising, and one that grants everything
Paid promotion is listed as not allowed with stock and synthetic avatars, with paid television and the major social platforms each named. Fliki's paid plans carry a commercial licence to all the content you create. As of 2026-09-22.
| The question | Synthesia | Fliki |
|---|---|---|
| A paid plan grants | Use, minus paid promotion with a stock avatar | A commercial licence to all your content |
| Paid social advertising | Named as not allowed with those avatars | Inside the licence as worded |
| What lifts a restriction | Using a custom avatar | Nothing to lift |
| Consequence named | Account suspension is mentioned | Not stated on the pages read |
Inclusion rule. Two vendors whose published answers in one column point in different directions, or sit far enough apart that a reader choosing between them would decide differently. Order. The vendor named first in the heading is the one whose wording is quoted first.
1Paying is not the same as being unrestricted
On one of these rows a customer can hold the most expensive subscription available and still be outside the permission for a paid social campaign, because the restriction follows the presenter rather than the invoice.
On the other, the first invoice produces a licence to the content with no use carved out. A buyer who assumes that paying ends the conversation is right about one of these two products and wrong about the other.
2Named platforms against a general grant
Listing paid television, Facebook, Instagram and YouTube advertising by name is unusually concrete. It tells a media planner exactly which line items are affected, which a general clause never does.
The other row is concrete in the opposite way: all the content you create is a phrase with no carve-outs to check. Both are readable; only one requires a media plan to be read alongside it.
3What each row permits without paying anything extra
Training videos and product videos on your own site are listed as permitted on the restricted row, so the limit is aimed at bought placement rather than at business use. That is a narrower restriction than the phrase paid promotion first suggests.
Read together the pair shows that the useful question is not whether commercial use is allowed but which uses are named. A register with one column for the answer has to point at the wording, which is what both cells do.
4A third set of terms on the same question
| The question | SceneMixer | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Commercial use | Output is the user's to the extent the law allows, royalty-free and commercial use included, and output made with free credits counts as paid for | SceneMixer, rights guide |
Inclusion rule. SceneMixer's own published wording on the column this pair was chosen for. Order. The sentence closest to the column first.
Its full row is on the SceneMixer entry.
- What is ruled outUse in any form of paid promotion is listed as not allowed with stock and synthetic avatars, and paid TV, Facebook, Instagram and YouTube ads are each listed by namestated against the avatar rather than the plan
- What is permittedTraining videos on your website and product videos on your website are listed as permittedlisted as ticks
- Entry pointOn the Standard plan you get a commercial license to all the content you create, and the media in Fliki is either licensed or royalty-free, giving the user of any paid plan commercial rightsStandard and above
5Both documents
The first column comes from the video licensing page at synthesia.io, read 2026-09-22; the second from the pricing page and published answers at fliki.ai, read 2026-09-22. Each vendor’s full row is on Synthesia and Fliki, and the column being compared is described on commercial use from. A comparison of wording is not legal advice. Other pairs: LTX and Leonardo, Fliki and Higgsfield.