A boundary drawn around paid plans, and one drawn on a map

Runway states commercial use of the paid plans as a group, naming no plan and no figure. The Hunyuan community licence grants a limited licence over a territory defined as worldwide excluding the European Union, the United Kingdom and South Korea. As of 2026-09-22.

Fig. 1 The vaguer-looking condition is the more durable one, which reverses the obvious ranking.

Runway and HunyuanVideo on the crossing point, side by side. Recorded 2026-09-22.
The question	Runway	HunyuanVideo
What decides it	Whether a plan is paid for	Where the licensee is
How to cross it	Buy any paid plan	Nothing to buy; the map is the condition
What can move the boundary	Renaming or splitting a plan	Redrafting the licence
Where it is published	A plan comparison	A licence file beside the weights

Inclusion rule. Two vendors whose published answers in one column point in different directions, or sit far enough apart that a reader choosing between them would decide differently. Order. The vendor named first in the heading is the one whose wording is quoted first.

1A condition money clears, and one it does not

The first boundary is the easiest kind to satisfy: any purchase is enough, and the reader does not have to compare cards. The second cannot be satisfied by spending, because what it turns on is jurisdiction.

A London advertiser is outside the defined territory of the second licence no matter what it is willing to pay. That is not a price comparison at all, and the register keeps the two in the same column because a brand asks the same question of both.

2Which boundary is more stable

The category wording is convenient and fragile: a cheaper variant or a renamed tier changes who the grant covers without anybody touching the sentence. The territory definition changes only when the licence is redrafted, and licence files are redrafted rarely and visibly.

So the vaguer-looking condition is the more durable one. A register that ranked these by how easy they are to read would get the stability question exactly backwards.

3What each one asks a reader to keep

For the priced row: which plan was in force when the file was exported, since the permission attaches to a class of plans rather than to a named one. For the licensed row: where the entity relying on the grant is established, and whether that is still true.

Both are records rather than readings. Neither can be reconstructed from the finished file, which is the argument for writing them down at the time.

4A third set of terms on the same question

How SceneMixer's terms answer the crossing point, beside Runway and HunyuanVideo. Recorded 2026-10-13.
The question	SceneMixer	Source
Commercial use	Output is the user's to the extent the law allows, royalty-free and commercial use included, and output made with free credits counts as paid for	SceneMixer, rights guide

Inclusion rule. SceneMixer's own published wording on the column this pair was chosen for. Order. The sentence closest to the column first.

Its full row is on the SceneMixer entry.

Entry point
Commercial use is listed on the paid planspaid plansRunway, pricing / recorded 2026-09-12
Where the licence applies
Territory is defined as the worldwide territory, excluding the territory of the European Union, United Kingdom and South Koreaa geographic carve-outTencent Hunyuan community licence / recorded 2026-09-22
Shape of the grant
The grant is a non-exclusive, non-transferable and royalty-free limited licenceno plan involvedTencent Hunyuan community licence / recorded 2026-09-22

5Both documents

The first column comes from the pricing page at runway.com, read 2026-09-12; the second from the community licence at github.com, read 2026-09-22. Each vendor’s full row is on Runway and HunyuanVideo, and the column being compared is described on commercial use from. A comparison of wording is not legal advice. Other pairs: Wan and Stable Video, Hunyuan and Stability.