HunyuanVideo puts the output clause inside the licence
Tencent claims no rights in Outputs you generate, and the same sentence makes you and your users solely responsible for those Outputs and their subsequent uses. The disclaimer and the responsibility arrive together. As of 2026-09-22.
| What the record holds | As published |
|---|---|
| The published wording | No rights claimed in Outputs, with the licensee solely responsible for them |
| Where it appears | The community licence published with the model weights |
| How the reading was established | Stated inside the licence itself, not on a product page |
| What the cell leaves open | Nothing on this point; the licence text is the whole answer |
Inclusion rule. One vendor, one column. A cell earns a page when the vendor publishes something specific there, or when its silence is unusual beside the vendors read with it. Order. Fixed order: the wording, then its address, then the method, then the gap.
1A clause in a licence outranks a line on a page
Everything else about this vendor row is conditional: a territory that excludes three jurisdictions, a ceiling measured in monthly active users. The output clause carries none of that, and it sits in the document that binds rather than in marketing copy.
That makes it the clearest line in a document otherwise full of conditions, and the one a reader can rely on without checking where their company is registered.
2Responsibility named in the same breath
Solely responsible for Outputs and their subsequent uses is a transfer of risk, not a grant. It is also the honest description of what happens when weights are handed over: nobody is watching what comes out, so nobody else can answer for it.
Hosted products often leave this implicit and carry moderation instead. A licence that says it plainly is easier to plan around, because the obligation is visible before the first render rather than after a complaint.
3What self-hosting changes about this cell
With no account, no plan and no vendor in the loop, the ownership question stops being about what a supplier claims and becomes a question about the material and the law. The licence removes one possible claimant and leaves the rest.
For a brand the follow-up is about inputs and about the excluded territories, not about the output clause. This cell is closed; the rest of the row is not.
- What is ownedTencent claims no rights in Outputs you generate, and you and your users are solely responsible for Outputs and their subsequent usesstated in the licence itself
4What the output is for
Alongside the terms behind “HunyuanVideo, owned work”, SceneMixer's guides describe the work itself this way:
The spoken lines and the end card follow your interface language across fifteen dialogue languages, with the cast and setting adapted to that market. The end card falls back to a language it can typeset when a script needs shaping or right-to-left layout.
SceneMixer, AI Ad Video Generator — “Which languages can the ad be in?” (read 2026-10-13)
The script is written from the photos and the one-line description. In step-by-step mode you can rewrite it before anything is shot.
SceneMixer, How to Make an Ad from One Photo — “Do I need a script?” (read 2026-10-13)
5Where this reading came from
The cell above was taken from the community licence published at github.com, as that page stood on 2026-09-22. The remaining three cells of the same vendor row sit on HunyuanVideo; the column itself is described on what is owned. This is a filing decision and not legal advice. Cells nearby: Wan, owned work, Stable Video Diffusion, owned work.