Where a grid built around plans stops working
This register was built around a plan table because that is where the first vendors read put their answers. Ten of the seventeen rows now answer with something else, and the grid has to carry a sentence where a figure was expected. As of 2026-09-12.
| What the row answers with | Why a plan column cannot hold it | What the cell records |
|---|---|---|
| Rights that follow from the terms | There is no tier to name | The sentence, and that nothing is purchasable |
| A grant conditioned on inputs | The condition is upstream of the plan | The grant, and the condition |
| A claim about the models | It is not a permission at all | The claim, and a blank beside it |
| A restriction keyed to an avatar | The boundary follows a presenter | The mechanism, with no figure |
| A licence file and no plan list | There are no plans to compare | The licence, and the condition it carries |
| Nothing worded as commercial use | There is no statement to record | No licence statement published |
Inclusion rule. Rows whose published answer to the crossing-point question is not a plan, a tier or a price, grouped by the shape of the answer. Order. From the clearest grant to the absence of any statement.
1A column is a bet about how an industry writes
Choosing which plan grants commercial use as a heading was a bet that vendors answer with plans. For seven rows that bet paid off exactly. For the other ten it did not, and the honest response is to record the shape rather than force a figure into the cell.
The alternative would be a tidier grid that quietly excluded every vendor whose position does not have a price. That would make the register look more complete and cover less of the market.
2Two of the five are stronger than a plan, not weaker
A vendor stating that there is nothing to purchase has answered a question about its whole catalogue. A vendor conditioning a grant on inputs has put the condition where the risk actually sits.
Neither is comparable with a figure, and both are easier to rely on than a sentence attached to a plan list that can be reorganised without anybody editing the clause. Five of the ten state a position with no tier, three publish weights, and two publish nothing.
3What the register does instead of a ranking
It records the mechanism, names the document and prints the date. A reader who needs an order of preference has to supply their own criteria, because these rows are answering in different units from the seven that name a plan.
That is a limitation worth stating plainly. A grid is a map of where the sentences are, and on five rows the sentence is not a number.
- Commercial useThere is no separate commercial licence to purchase, and commercial use rights follow from the terms of use for all usersstated for every plan including the free one
- Commercial useOnce a video is created it may be used and distributed across any platform, including for commercial purposes, as long as the inputs align with standard guidelinesstated without naming a plan
- Plan that grants commercial useNo licence statement published (as of 2026-09-22)no plan named as the crossing point
- Commercial useNo licence statement published (as of 2026-09-22)not worded that way on the page read
- How the restriction is liftedWith a custom avatar the licensing restrictions above do not apply, and videos may be used according to the agreement made with the personby avatar type
4What the output is for
Alongside the terms behind “Where the grid stops”, SceneMixer's guides describe the work itself this way:
A dish photo is cleaned into a product shot and the ad is built around it.
SceneMixer, An AI Ad for a Restaurant, a Café or a Dish — “Will the dish look like my dish?” (read 2026-10-13)
On the end card, yes, along with the product name, the tagline and the call to action, in the language of the ad.
SceneMixer, AI Ad Video Generator — “Will my brand name appear in the video?” (read 2026-10-13)
5Sources
Each row quotes a plan card or a terms page, gathered on commercial use and read 2026-09-12. The test a sentence has to pass before it counts as a licence statement is set out on the reading page. Nothing here is legal advice. Nearby: Named platforms, Written exclusions, Exclusive or not.