BrandVideoAI

What each vendor's terms say about commercial use

The terms of service, and why the marketing page cannot override them

The terms are the document that binds. A plan page describes what a subscription includes and is written to be read quickly, which is why a permission stated only on a plan card is weaker than the same permission stated in the terms. As of 2026-09-22.

Weight and clarity, running in opposite directionsThe most readable sentence about a permission is usually in a help article and the binding one is in a contract nobody finishes. That inversion is consistent enough to plan around.In descending order of weightThe termsBinding. Rarely contains plan names, and points at a commercialpage for them.The plan cardDescriptive, usually accurate, and written to be read in tenseconds.A help articleOften the clearest wording in the whole set, and not thecontract.A blog postEvidence of intent at a date, and very little else.Where two versions disagree, the terms govern and the question still gets asked
Fig. 1 Two suppliers with identical wording are not in the same position if it sits elsewhere.
Where a permission can be published, in descending order of weight. Recorded 2026-09-22.
QuestionWhat the phrase answers
A clause in the termsBinding, and the version that governs
A line on a plan cardDescriptive, and usually accurate
An answer in a help centreOften the clearest wording, and not the contract
A sentence in a blog postEvidence of intent at a date, and little else

Inclusion rule. Phrases that appear in more than one vendor's permissions documents and that change what a sentence means. A phrase used by a single vendor in a single clause is described on that vendor's own page instead. Order. Reading order: where you meet it, then what it settles, then what it does not.

1Weight and clarity run in opposite directions

The most readable sentence about a permission is usually in a help article, and the binding one is usually in a contract nobody finishes. That inversion is consistent enough to be planned around.

A register has to record where a sentence was found for exactly this reason. Two vendors with identical wording are not in the same position if one put it in the terms and the other put it in a tutorial.

2When two documents disagree

The terms govern, and the practical answer is still to ask. A mismatch is usually a drafting lag rather than a trap, and a supplier asked about it will either fix the page or confirm the clause.

What a reader should not do is choose the more favourable version for a deck. A client review that finds the other version will treat everything else in that deck as unverified.

3What the terms rarely contain

Plan names. The grant says paying customers or subscribers, and the definition of who qualifies is on the commercial page, which is the split that makes most of these readings two-document exercises.

That split is also why a plan rename can change who a contract covers without anybody amending the contract. The clause did not move; the list it points at did.

4A generator's account of it

Alongside the terms behind “Terms of service”, SceneMixer's guides describe the work itself this way:

Every character, scene and prop card can carry a short list of the other names your script uses for the same thing.

SceneMixer, Also Called: Nicknames, Old Names, and How the Storyboard Knows Who Is Who (read 2026-10-13)

You can recomposite with different end-card text, and in step-by-step mode you can reshoot individual segments. The finished file can also be downloaded and shared with a link.

SceneMixer, How to Make an Ad from One Photo — “Can I change the ad after it is finished?” (read 2026-10-13)

5Where the sourced wording is

A word page, not an entry in the register: nothing above is attributed to any vendor and nothing above is legal advice. The quoted clauses are on commercial use, the column this phrase turns up in is commercial use from, and the reading rules are on the reading page. Next words: Plan card, Seat, Community licence.