invideo AI has no free plan, so the trap does not exist
No free plan appears on invideo AI's plan page. The free-tier question does not arise, and with it the commonest trap in this register disappears: nobody here can publish work made under a licence they never crossed into. As of 2026-09-12.
| What the record holds | As published |
|---|---|
| The published wording | No free plan appears on the plan page |
| Where it appears | The plan page, which prices per seat rather than per generation |
| How the reading was established | The question does not arise |
| What the cell leaves open | Whether a time-limited trial exists, which is not a free plan for this column |
Inclusion rule. One vendor, one column. A cell earns a page when the vendor publishes something specific there, or when its silence is unusual beside the vendors read with it. Order. Fixed order: the wording, then its address, then the method, then the gap.
1No free tier, no free-tier trap
The recurring hazard on this grid is a user who generates something under a free plan, publishes it, and only later learns that the permission began one card higher. That sequence needs a free plan to exist, and on this row it does not.
It is a rare shape. Most vendors here use a free tier to acquire users and place the licence above it, which is a reasonable commercial decision and an expensive one for whoever reads the plan page too quickly.
2A trial is not a free plan for this column
Trials and promotional credits come and go, are often unlisted, and usually run under the terms of the plan being trialled. Treating one as a free tier would put a temporary offer in a column meant to hold a standing plan, and the cell would go stale within weeks.
So the reading is taken from the standing plan list only. If a trial exists and carries its own licence wording, that belongs in the crossing point cell for this vendor, where conditions attached to a purchase are recorded.
3What the shape means for a brand
Every account here is a paying account, so the question shifts from whether the licence was crossed to which seat produced the file. Per-seat products make that a real question: the permission attaches to an account, and accounts belong to people who change jobs.
That is a records problem rather than a reading problem, and it is the one worth solving before a campaign ships rather than after a freelancer's access lapses.
- Free tierNo free plan appears on the pricing pagenone offered
- Entry pointCommercial use is listed on the paid plansno free plan offered
4From the making side
Alongside the terms behind “invideo AI, free tier”, SceneMixer's guides describe the work itself this way:
Under the terms, what you generate is yours to the extent the law allows, royalty-free, commercial use included.
SceneMixer, What You Get to Keep (read 2026-10-13)
The photo is cleaned into a product shot and that object appears in every shot.
SceneMixer, An AI Ad for a Physical Product — “Will the product look like my product?” (read 2026-10-13)
5Where this reading came from
The cell above was taken from the pricing page published at invideo.io, as that page stood on 2026-09-12. The remaining three cells of the same vendor row sit on invideo AI; the column itself is described on free tier. This is a filing decision and not legal advice. Cells nearby: Synthesia, free tier, HeyGen, free tier.