The vendors who grant commercial use with no plan
Four vendors here grant commercial use, or assert it, with no plan attached: rights that follow from the terms for everybody, a permission conditioned on inputs, a free tier that already carries it, and a claim made of the models rather than of a tier. As of 2026-09-12.
| Vendor | What is stated | What it attaches to instead |
|---|---|---|
| Higgsfield | Commercial rights follow from the terms | Every user, with no licence to purchase |
| HeyGen | A created video may be used commercially | The inputs aligning with the guidelines |
| Leonardo.Ai | A free user may download for commercial usage | The account being the generation's owner |
| Adobe Firefly | Model outputs are safe for commercial use | The models, and their training material |
Inclusion rule. Vendors whose published statement grants or asserts commercial use without naming a plan, a tier or a price. A no-plan statement that restricts rather than grants is recorded on the vendor page instead. Order. Grants first, then the claim made about the models, since the last is a different kind of sentence.
1A register shaped around a crossing point
This grid's middle column asks which plan grants commercial use. Four rows answer with a sentence instead of a figure, and the sentence is the answer rather than an evasion of one.
Each has a different anchor. One attaches the rights to the terms of use; one attaches them to the material that went in; one attaches them to ownership of the generation; one attaches a claim to the models themselves. A fifth vendor also names no plan, and does it by restricting rather than granting, so it sits outside this table.
2Only three of the four are permissions
Safe for commercial use is a statement about where training material came from. It addresses whether somebody else is likely to object rather than whether the supplier does, which is a different worry with a different remedy.
Keeping it in the same column as the three grants is a compromise. The alternative is leaving the row blank, which would suggest the vendor published nothing on the subject when it published a paragraph.
3What an untiered answer is worth to a buyer
It is stability. Nothing about the position changes when a plan is renamed, a tier is split or an account is downgraded, which removes the commonest failure mode in this register entirely.
What it costs is comparability. A buyer cannot put these four rows in a price order, and a procurement process that requires one will either invent a figure or drop the vendors that do not supply one.
- Commercial useThere is no separate commercial licence to purchase, and commercial use rights follow from the terms of use for all usersstated for every plan including the free one
- Commercial useOnce a video is created it may be used and distributed across any platform, including for commercial purposes, as long as the inputs align with standard guidelinesstated without naming a plan
- Free tierA free user can download their own generations for commercial usagecommercial use granted
- Commercial useOutputs from Adobe Firefly AI models are described as safe for commercial useasserted of the models rather than of a plan
4A generator's account of it
Alongside the terms behind “No plan attached”, SceneMixer's guides describe the work itself this way:
The terms grant you the output to the extent the law allows, and that includes commercial use.
SceneMixer, What You Get to Keep — “Do I own the copyright in what I generate?” (read 2026-10-13)
A dish photo is cleaned into a product shot and the ad is built around it.
SceneMixer, An AI Ad for a Restaurant, a Café or a Dish — “Will the dish look like my dish?” (read 2026-10-13)
5Sources
Each row quotes a plan card or a terms page, gathered on commercial use and read 2026-09-12. The test a sentence has to pass before it counts as a licence statement is set out on the reading page. Nothing here is legal advice. Nearby: Not money, What is kept, Weights, not plans.